Community Members Shame Absent SF LGBT Pride Parade Board

"People's board meeting" votes unanimously to reinstate Bradley Manning as SF Pride grand marshal. Photo: Liz Highleyman

“People’s board meeting” votes unanimously to reinstate Bradley Manning as SF Pride grand marshal. Photo: Liz Highleyman

Approximately 60 people gathered Tuesday for a “people’s board meeting” in front of the SF Pride office at Market and Pearl Street, to protest the Pride board’s revocation of Bradley Manning’s grand marshal election and its lack of accountability to the community.

As previously reported, last week more than 100 community members attempted to attend a Pride board meeting and give public comment about their support for the Wikileaks whistleblower. That meeting ended in chaos after only a handful of people were allowed in to speak, with board treasurer David Currie promising that a new meeting would be scheduled in a larger venue.

On Sunday the board cancelled a previously scheduled May 14 membership meeting, stating that its Manning decision was firm and a public meeting would not take place until after the June 30 Pride fest.

Undeterred, community members came together anyway to shame the absent board members — represented by empty chairs on the sidewalk — and offer the public testimony they were previously denied.

“Bradley Manning is one of the heroes of this generation of soldiers,” said Michael Wong of SF Veterans for Peace. “Soldiers have a duty to report wrongdoing.”

Njobe, an organizer of the SF Dyke March, encouraged people not to support Pride, urging, “Don’t give them your money!” While some activists have called for a boycott of this year’s festival, others favor a large pro-Manning contingent in the parade.

Tommi Avicolli Mecca reminded listeners that many of the people who started the Gay Liberation movement in the late 1960s came from the Vietnam antiwar movement. “We have long history of supporting people who used radical means to change society,” he said.

Kyles DeVries announced that a group of radical faeries have named Manning the first “Queen of the Faeries,” after which many in the assembled crowd moved to the LGBT Center across the street to participate in a Harvey Milk Club PAC forum on Pride and Manning.
Continue reading

Campos Compromises-Terminal Not SFO to be Renamed in Milk’s Memory

Harvey Milk stencil by SF artist Jeremy Novy

Harvey Milk stencil by SF artist Jeremy Novy

As the Biscuit has reported several times since January, Supervisor David Campos (District 9), introduced the idea of renaming SFO in honor of slain civil rights leader and Castro icon, Harvey Milk. Now it seems the powers that be have come up with a compromise solution-a terminal within the airport to bear his name instead of the entire facility.

There have been heated debates, rallies and an outpouring of community support for the idea alongside some very organized opposition to Campos’ plan.

While the late Supervisor Milk and his legacy are revered in some circles others felt he didn’t deserve such a magnanimous gesture of having the airport re-tagged in his honor. Campos’ had five votes sewn up from fellow Supervisors to move forward with his rebranding bid but the all important sixth deciding vote eluded him. That vote would have to be supplied by one of the freshmen Supervisors and none seemed convinced it was in their constituents (or perhaps theirs political) best interest.

Note Terminal 1 the unofficial selection to be renamed for Harvey Milk. Photo: FlySFO.

Note Terminal 1 the unofficial selection to be renamed for Harvey Milk. Photo: FlySFO.

Becoming convinced the job would be a raucous, uphill battle where the final decision for the name change would be placed before City voters in an off-year November ballot initiative Campos worked with Mayor Ed Lee to find a compromise-renaming one of SFO’s terminals in Harvey’s memory.

The plan now stands a committee composed of members hand-picked by the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor’s camps representing both of their interests would put together a proposal for how to make this all happen and come back with solid plans and goals within the next three months.

Supervisor Campos’ dream of having visitors to our City pass through Harvey Milk Airport has been whittled down, but, he believes his main goal-of teaching and honoring Harvey’s dream of equality and hope for all-can still be realized via the terminals prominence and position.

Which terminal is to be selected still remains to be seen. Currently Terminal One is amidst a remodeled and may be the easiest to transition in signage and other alterations to carry the late Supervisors moniker.

-Reminder the State of California’s official Harvey Milk holiday is May 22nd. Local celebrations are planned. Click the link to see what’s happening locally in the Castro.

The beautiful shrine to Harvey Milk assembled by members of the SF political club named in his honor-Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club

The beautiful shrine to Harvey Milk assembled by members of the SF Harvey Milk LGBT Democratic Club at the 2012 Milk/Moscone Anniversary March at Castro and Market. Photo: Waiyde Palmer

UPDATE: HBO Gay Series Based in SF Gets Go Ahead-Eight Episodes Ordered

HBO LogoAs we posted at the end of March HBO shot a pilot for a new Queer boy dramedy recently around the Castro and City. Word comes now that the award winning cable giant has optioned the still as yet unnamed series for eight more episodes.

The pilot written by Michael Lannan, Interior Leather Bar, was directed by Andrew Haigh who made the highly acclaimed film, Weekend, and stars Glee regular Jonathan Groff, New York stage actor, Frankie J. Alvarez, and former Guiding Light soap hunk, Australian, Murray Bartlett, playing the three principles.

Other particulars about the series, according to the Hollywood Reporter:

The pilot is based on Michael Lannan’s feature script Lorimer. Haigh will executive produce alongside Bored to Death’s Sarah Condon and Brothers and Sisters’ David Marshall Grant, with Lannan receiving a co-EP credit.

The untitled entry revolves around the three friends in San Francisco who explore the fun and sometimes overwhelming options available to a new generation of Gay men.  Production will begin in the fall in San Francisco for a 2014 premiere.

This is a good news for a number of reasons. The new series will help raise the number of LGBT themed shows-or shows with principle Gay characters-on television from its current level. It was recently announced that both The New Normal and Happy Endings would be cancelled at the end of the 2013 television season..

The loss of both shows has been claimed as victories by the neo-conservative and notoriously anti-Gay group, One Million Moms, a branch of the American Family Assoc., who’ve made it their mission to eradicate anything Queer off of the telly to ‘save the children’. Keeping Queer themed work available on television helps dismantle religious led bigotry and societal prejudice against the LGBT community by providing glimpses into our lives. It can provide isolated Queer youth with valuable visual confirmation that they are not alone in this world.

Series creator, Michael Lannan. Photo: IMBD

Series creator, Michael Lannan. Photo: IMBD

Additionally revenue brought in by the HBO shoot will help feed the always hungry local economy, lift the City’s star power another notch attracting even more lucrative television and film company’s to bring upcoming projects to town and provides work for SF actors, artisans, production and film workers.

Concerns have been leveled in countless blog comment sections-including this one-that the show will just be another all white male production unrepresentative of the City’s true LGBT population. Producers has been sensitive to that reality and cast an array of actors from multiple communities and set a Latino among it’s leading men.

Other commenters have expressed disdain at the idea that this will be a Queer version of Friends or Sex in the City. Time will tell if their criticism holds true, but for now, keep your eyes peeled for the production and it’s crew working around the Castro and City.

via Towleroad

Celebrations for Harvey Milk Day set for around the Castro

Harvey Milk Day May 22ndIt’s been 5 years since Arnold Schwarzenegger established Harvey Milk Day. On May 22nd, we celebrate the life of this first-ever openly gay politician, gay rights activist, lover, brother, and to a lucky some, old friend. If you’re looking for a way to celebrate, check out some of the events happening around the Castro this week (if we are missing any, let us know and we will get them up!):

May 19th
At 1PM at Jane Warner Plaza, speeches, music and a reenactment of Milk’s stirring 1977 “You’ve Got To Have Hope” speech. The speech will be performed by five local artists: Courtney Walsh and Aaron Wimmer, two actors from “Dear Harvey”, the recent New Conservatory play about Milk’s life; Randall Mann, local poet and winner of the 2003 Kenyon Review Prize in Poetry; Sister Roma, drag artist and 20-year member of the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, and; Andrea Shorter, political activist. Organized by the Castro Community Benefit District.

May 22nd
All day at the GLBT History Museum they will be giving free admission to all visitors and providing special Milk-related displays and tours. In addition, the museum is extending a welcome to Bay Area schools, many of which plan GLBT history activities in conjunction with Harvey Milk Day.

At 2:00, 4:30, 7:00, 9:30 at the Castro Theatre, the non-profit group, Friends of Harvey Milk, will be showing the film MILK which charts the last eight years of Milk’s life and his political platform, revealing a legacy that resonates in the here and now.

At 7PM at Books, Inc., in comemmoration of Harvey Milk’s birthday the SF GLBT History Museum and Books Inc. present An Archive of Hope: Harvey Milk’s Speeches and Writings, with editors Jason Edward Black and Charles E. Morris III, photographer & former employee at Harvey Milk’s camera shop Daniel Nicoletta, and Harvey’s speechwriter, Frank Robinson. Check out our review of the book.

Planning Department reveals final Castro Street designs

A neighbor asks questions about the new design

A neighbor asks questions about the new design

Yesterday, the San Francisco Planning Department held their final public meeting to show off the finished designs for the $4 million dollar overhaul of Castro Street. The “Open House” was held over at the Market & Noe Center (the vacant space next to RadioShack) and the turnout was great.

In the front of the room, easels with details of the process and the final design were formed in a semi-circle. Representatives from various city departments were at each station and were available to ask questions. Attendees were invited to grab a sticky-note pad and write down their questions or concerns and stick them to the boards.

In the final design:

  • sidewalks widened from 12′ to 22′
  • sidewalk bulbous at crosswalks
  • Jane Warner Plaza repaving
  • possible nixing of north-bound left-turn onto 18th from Castro (depending on survey feedback)
  • a more direct crossing path across Market Street near Jane Warner Plaza
  • accent trees near intersections will be King Palms
  • trees along the mid-block will be Columnar Ginkos
  • rainbow sidewalks, glittery pavement, led lighting and/or Castro history facts on sidewalks if bids come in low enough

Construction is set for January 2014 and is expected to be completed around October.

The Planning Department has not yet made the design available on the project’s website, but as soon as they do, we’ll link to them.

CVS Reveals Remodel for Market Noe Center & They’re Rated ‘D’ for Dull

2280 Market St. CVS (yawn) rendering.

2280 Market St. CVS (yawn) rendering.

Tuesday, May 14th the Planning Commission and pharmacy giant CVS revealed their formula retail remodel plans for the former Tower Records/Market & Noe (2280 Market Street) space and frankly they’re really dull.

As proposed, four of the Market and Noe Center’s protruding concrete bays will be removed and CVS’s section of 2280 Market Street’s concrete façade will be overlayed with cement-board siding, a metal lattice, and metal trim.

What is even more confusing is how CVS made it through the approval gauntlet while fellow formula retailer, Starbucks, did not. Earlier in the week the SF Planning Commission nixed the proposed Mega-Bux at the corner of Sanchez and Market St. citing three specific problems.

  1.  Over 20% saturation of formula retail stores within 300 feet of the proposed local.
  2. Style and design of the new Starbucks would be too dominant at such a visible spot.
  3. The  particular area was already well served by businesses offering the same services.

Comparing the reasoning that shoots down Starbucks while giving CVS the thumb’s up is a bit confounding.

Under new rules set for by the Commission and supported by Dist. 8 Supervisor Scott Wiener, the number of formulaic retail stores can not exceed 20% of the businesses within a 300 feet span in any given area. The Market St. Walgreens falls just outside that radius at approximately 400 feet away from the proposed new CVS. Also out of consideration is the reality of the total seven pharmacies within a half mile of CVS each providing the same exact service for meds and three providing same goods.

Undaunted by these truths the Planning Commission states CVS would, “provide an additional choice of pharmacy and basic everyday needs goods for neighborhood residents, resulting in prices that are more competitive and a greater availability of goods and services.”

Pardon me wha..?

As we noted earlier when denying Starbucks approval the same Commission stated, “The Upper Market NCT is already well served by existing similar eating and drinking establishments that are considered coffee houses like Peets, Church St. Cafe, Cafe Flore, and Sweet Inspiration.” Are we not equally well served in our seven other pharmacies choices that carry basic everyday needs as well?

Sketch of the new proposed Starbucks

Sketch of the new proposed Starbucks

Then there’s the CVS store design. Starbucks proposal for their new space-though unwanted by the community-was sleek, inviting and modern. It was rejected as the design was dominate and at odds with other nearby buildings destroying the neighborhood character of other local retailers.

CVS’s rebuild plans removes the clock, the already utilitarian building’s lone interesting architectural quality from the tower, and transforms it into a metal and cement box evocative of an East Berlin, cold war era, prison complex. What about that design is in keeping with the aesthetic of the area like Cafe Flore’s funky feel two doors away?

Is anyone else confused?

We have covered the debate and been opposed to Starbucks fourth insertion into the Castro since we started the Biscuit. We’re equally unimpressed with CVS’s arrival and the lack of fight from the neighborhood to keep it out. The Trader Joe’s that was proposed in 2011 would’ve been a better fit for the community in that space but they withdrew after a onslought of local biz cried foul-including the DTNA. Trader Joe’s also realized they’d never have enough parking to meet their customers needs and let the struggle for the space go.

It’s an odd juxtaposition to not see organized groups like Merchants of Upper Market Castro or the Castro Community Benefit District let CVS slide into the Castro without the same vigor of objection that was leveled at both Starbucks and Trader Joe’s. Duboce Triangle Neighborhood Association who fought tooth and nail to keep Starbucks at bay have reached a compromise with CVS and withdrew all objections.

Where are the petitions, the Facebook pages imploring voices to be raised and Change.org, ‘sign me to stop CVS’ invites? Do we as a community really need an eighth pharmacy to buy toilet paper, condoms and get our prescriptions filled?

As these and other questions go unanswered CVS hopes to acquire the permits quickly, start the remodel and be up and running by February of 2014.

-via SocketSite

UPDATE: Church Street Designated Red Lanes a Success MUNI Says

22 Fillmore and J Church on Church St. Photo:SFMTA

22 Fillmore and J Church on Church St. Photo: SFMTA

MUNI has reported the newly adorned ‘red lanes’, designated MUNI or taxi only, on the highly congested part of  Church Street between Duboce and 16th Streets at the far edge of the Castro District has been successful in keeping service running better.

We posted in March that the lanes were being set aside for public transport use only as part of an 18 month, Church Street Rapid pilot program to determine if this small gambit would help improve MUNI reliability on the notoriously slow and nearly always late 22-Fillmore bus and J-Church train lines.

According to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) who initiated the change the answer is, “yes”. They report the 22-Fillmore has had a 5% reduction in travel time and a 20% uptick in reliability along that narrow obstacle course of Church Street.

Those who still drive the route should be aware you’re no longer allowed to turn left at 15th or 16th Streets. Driving in those designated red lanes can result in heavy fines as does taking illegal left turns. Both rules applies to bicyclists as well who are subject to the same traffic laws as their motorized counterparts. The ‘no left turn’ will remain if the pilot program becomes permanent.

So far only 16 tickets have been issued for illegal left turns. You can expect that number to soar now that the SFMTA is leaning towards retaining the alteration. Illegal left turn tickets run between $200-$310.00 which could be a boon for the City treasury if drivers and bicyclists don’t start paying attention to the new rules and somewhat visible ‘no left turn’ street signage.

-via Examiner