Sup. Wiener Gets His Groove On-Backs Revamping DJ and Event Permits

Let's Party!

Castro nightlife in black light

Supervisor Scott Wiener, not exactly known for his ‘Hey Mr. DJ, put a record on!’, vibe is coming to the aid of local DJ’s and club promoters by proposing new legislation that will streamline the way permits are issued by the City for parties and outdoor events.

As it stands now you need a City Hall road map, a hired guide and the patience of a Shoalin Zen Master to wind your way through the maze that is ‘Event Planning with Music’.

Juanita MORE! on the turntables at Booty Call at QBar in the Castro

Juanita MORE! found on the turntables during her weekly event Booty Call at QBar in the Castro.

Let’s say you wanna get your party on.  You’ve gotten all the required material:  Lady Bear as Door Whore Supreme, a theme that fluctuates nicely between muscle and mary, and of course the pivotal need-a killer DJ like Juanite MORE! from the Castro’s wildly popular Booty Call at QBar. You head to City Hall and are told you need a Limited Live Performance Permit.

Limited Live Performance Permits take up to 60 days to wrangle and cost $385, as a one time (rip off). surcharge. You will then need to fork out an additional $129 per year to hold on to it so you’re not forced to start the whole process all over again.

Feeling  your teeth starting to grind? Wait. You will also need a Place of Entertainment Permit. That’s gonna cost you $1500 bucks plus the added joy of interacting with SIX City Departments. Bureaucracy times six. Doesn’t that sound pleasant?

Did we mention you’re going to need to present a ‘security plan’ to the powers-that-be as well? Uh. Huh. Work the blue print of process and public policy gone array.

Wiener’s proposal to dismantle the hubris would let DJ’s just use the first permit to throw parties and skip the second, much harder to acquire and more expensive, Place of Entertainment Permit.

He also believes the Entertainment Commission should be watchdogs over clubs, venues and parties and be in charge of determining who’re sneaking under the radar and skipping the permit process completely. As it stands now SFPD is responsible for ferreting out these freeloaders, and everyone involved knows, their workload is already overtaxed. Parties without permits are rarely caught or get hit with the $500 per day fine.

The third component Wiener is hoping to change is allowing DJ/Club Promoters and event planners to use plazas and courtyards easier by only needing a Limited Live Performance Permit as well.

Sup. Wiener in a laid back moment gettin' his swerve on.

Sup. Wiener in a laid back moment gettin’ his swerve on.

Wiener told the Board of Supes on Tuesday, “This legislation fosters live entertainment while also heightening our ability to monitor and regulate bad actors. The Entertainment Commission will be more effective in issuing permits and enforcing the law.”

To most Club Insiders the City has been waging a War on Fun for quite some time. Club closures, loss of liquor licenses for minor infractions, the removal of DJ’s who mix music for the enjoyment of the bar’s patrons where dancing isn’t allowed are just a few of the punitive devices thats been employed in a full court press curtailing SF and the Castro’s infamous nightlife.

Sup. Wiener is a practical politician who can see a revenue stream for the community and City drying up and wants to encourage club and DJ’s to be more responsible, and at the same time, allow them to do what it is they do best-throw kick ass parties.

As the War on Fun was escalating in 2012 the City conducted a study, at the insistence of the Supervisor, City’s Entertainment Commission, bar and business owners, that concluded nightlife is a $4.2 billion business in San Francisco and provides the City with $55 million in tax revenue.

With that kind of cheddar at stake it’s not surprising to see the fiscally aware Supervisor picking up the gauntlet to champion these changes. He has maintained a commitment to both the business community and the City’s citizens to keep our burg in the black and that won’t happen if we lose any more revenue like that provided by nightlife.

The Latest Skinny on Past Posts of Neighborhood News

We’ve posted a great deal in the past month or so about a myriad of stories  in the Castro that have generated quite a bit of interest. This week the follow-up news has been a hot and heavy maelstrom resolving at least one issue that’s been festering since 2009.

Cafe Flore (credit: Eric Nielson)

Cafe Flore (credit: Eric Nielson)

Cafe Flore restaurant in jeopardy: As our Editor in Chief, Roy,  posted last week, Cafe Flore had run afoul of a organzied effort by members of the community and two neighborhood associations over their off site kitchen use.

Sup. Wiener had proposed a targeted code variance which would allow the venerable and much beloved icon of the Castro to continue using the off site, code compliant, food prep site its had functioning for the last two decades. Many of the opposition thought this was unfair and that all businesses should be held to the exact same standards no matter what.

We’re happy to report that the Oversight Committee in charge of the issue via Board of Supervisors approved the change this week and now Cafe Flore is free of threats to its continued operation. The off site kitchen will continue to be used keeping Flore up and running without hiccups.

fitness-sf-expansionSF Fitness seeks to expand and remodel building: In October the Biscuit posted that LA based Coffee Bean & Tea Leaf was hoping to expand into the Castro with a new store opening in the old Vibrant Health Vitamin Center.

This new addition to the Castro was contingent on a couple of issues-the biggest-wether or not SF Fitness could get a zone variance to enlarge the building on the corner of Market and Noe St. Their goal since 2009 has been to add several floors which would include much-needed rental units as well as expanding the gym to accommodate an ever-growing clientel.

Working with the Board of Supes, under the guidance of Supervisor Wiener, the remodel has received the go ahead. Mr. Wiener piggybacked the zone change for SF Fitness onto the same multi-faceted legislation that included Cafe Flore’s off site kitchen issue.

Coffee Bean and Tea Leaf signed a lease with the owners of SF Fitness, the Jackovics family, following the approval. Coffee Bean will still have to get approval to open which may prove to be a daunting task considering how corporate chain stores are received and disliked in the neighborhood.

milk-sfo-rallyRally for renaming SFO for Harvey Milk: We’ve posted three times about the battle heating up to rename SFO.

Friday saw a huge coalition of supporters rally at City Hall in favor of changing the name of SFO to honor the late, Castro Supervisor and civil rights leader, Harvey Milk.

Led by chief proponents Sup. David Campos who introduced the resolution to the Board, and Stuart Milk, Harvey’s nephew and Milk Foundation head, about a hundred people took part from a wide swath of San Francisco political organizations and citizenry. Kicking off the rally with chants and speeches of support media from throughout the Bay Area was on hand to cover and help get out the word that the battle is on to make this idea a reality.

Friday Sup. Campos said 80 airports are named after people across the U.S. but there is no representation from the LGBT community.

“Why shouldn’t San Francisco be that City?” Campos asked those gathered at the rally.

Campos isn’t alone in this quest he’s enlisted the support of four other supervisors, including John Avalos, Scott Wiener, Jane Kim and Eric Mar. One more supervisor will be needed to get the issue on a City ballot.

Campos goal is to have this issue on the agenda by Fall of 2013.

 

 

Sup. Wiener’s Condo Conversion Plan Angers Many-City Hall Protest Monday

Dist 2 Sup. Mark Ferrell and Dist. 8 Sup. Scott Wiener

Dist 2 Sup. Mark Ferrell and Dist. 8 Sup. Scott Wiener

Castro’s Sup. Scott Wiener and Dist. 2 Sup, Mark Ferrell, have introduced legislation which, if passed, could allow owners to repeal rent control from thousands of landlord-occupied apartment buildings.

Their plan will let Tenant in Common (TIC) buildings become condominiums automatically, bypassing the condo conversions lottery and tenant protections in the City’s condo conversion law.

The legislation will let any TIC property with two or more owner occupants pay a fee to become a condominium. Currently, under California state law, condominiums are exempt from rent control.

The issue comes before the full Board on Monday, January 28th. Opponents against the new edict have called for a noon rally and protest at City Hall followed by participation in pubic comment during the 1:30 PM BOS hearing.

Opponents say Wiener’s proposed legislation is a huge gift to property owners. If passed by the BOS, following the trend of current condo conversion figures, the value of these newly converted condos will increase the property by well over 20%. Its estimated 2,000 such units will be eligible.

SF Tenants UnionRenter’s rights groups consider this new law an unneeded financial boon to landlords. Landlords are collecting record profits. According to a recent HuffPo post, San Francisco has the highest rents in the country.

This law, activists challenge, benefits SF’s 1%, politically connected, City Hall insiders not the everyday, 99% majority.

Many renters fear If this legislation passes, they can expect to see a sharp increase in evictions as landlords anticipate that City Hall will let them move in, pay the fee to convert to condo and thus repeal rent control on all units within the building.

A Coalition of Tenant Rights Groups rally at 18th & Castro. Dec. 19, 2012 (Photo: AsianWeek)

A Coalition of Tenant Rights Groups rally at 18th & Castro. Dec. 19, 2012 (Photo: AsianWeek)

This proposed new law adds insult to injury piled on top of increased evictions from the unbridled use of the Ellis Act. Protests have been ongoing as tenant advocacy groups have rallied, most recently on Dec.19th in the Castro, to raise awareness and support  for a change in the law.

There are a rash of new builds in the pipeline in various stages of development within the City. SF real estate blog, SocketSite, forecasts 43,580 will be added to the rental/own market, including five on deck in the Castro, completed in the next four to five years.

Approximately 2700-3200 of those projected units will have been finished in various City neighborhoods and ready for move in by the end of 2013. Compare that number to the less than 250 new units made available in all of 2011 and it’s apparent real estate development in SF is experiencing another unprecedented boom.

Protesting EvictionsSadly little of these new, available units helps San Francisco’s working/middle class, working poor or those who fall below the poverty level currently struggling to maintain residence in the City.

Additionally none of these new build units would be covered under the auspices of current, SF, rent control, guidelines. The City’s rent control only applies to buildings constructed prior to June 13,1979.

“Ellis evictions have tripled and rents now average over $3,000 a month,” said Tommi Avicolli Mecca of the Housing Rights Committee one of Monday’s coalition organizers. “Renters are struggling to remain in their homes and in the city and this is the wrong time to give speculators an incentive to do more evictions.”

Sierra Club, SF Bay Area Chapter, came out against the Wiener/Ferrel ordinance. The Club encouraged all San Franciscan’s to join them in writing the Board to strike down the proposal. They also want everyone to attend Monday’s rally, protest and public speak out.

Sierra Club said, in part, in their missive to the Board, “Instead of enacting this ordinance, the City of San Francisco should pursue policies that protect rent stabilization and rent-stabilized units, which are a housing type that can’t be expanded (by law), and support the construction of more affordable housing, including family size units.”

Popular local blog, BeyondChron concluded, “Increasing condo conversions and eliminating rent control for thousands of units does nothing to address any of the housing affordability and no-fault eviction problems impacting San Francisco. Instead, it makes them worse.”